Legal Opinion

Speights v. Speights

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 5, 2013No. 2012-CA-00737-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Shain and Dana Speights were granted an irreconcilable-differences divorce by the Lawrence County Chancery Court. Shain appeals the chancellor’s decision to award physical custody of the parties’ four minor children to Dana, in addition to the award of $2,500 in attorney’s fees to Dana. This Court affirms the award of physical custody. However, we find an abuse of discretion in the chancellor’s award of attorney’s fees. Thus, we reverse and remand that portion of the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Shain and Dana were married on July 14, 2000. During the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bell v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Creekmore v. CreekmoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dunn v. DunnMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pikco Finance, Inc. v. Staten (In re Staten)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2016
  2. In the Matter of the Estate of Elijah Forkner, Deceased: Mimi Forkner Berry v. Tamika Forkner and Betsy RandolphCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024
  3. Sharon E. Harris v. The National Oak Park High School Alumni Assoc.,InCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API