Gale v. Butler

Poland, Ch. J.

The orator in this ease has appealed from the decree made by the chancellor, apportioning the costs of the cause between the parties, claiming that the decree should have been in his favor for his full costs.

As we understand the case, the orator originally obtained a *450decree in liis favor to the full extent he claimed in his bill, and for his costs, and the defendant appealed from that decree. The supreme court held that the orator was entitled to have a decree as to one portion of his claim, but was not entitled to a decree upon another, and the larger part, and for which he had…