Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Milliron

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 24, 1980No. 79-408Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Defendants appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion to vacate an ex parte confirmation of judgment. The issues raised by the appeal are whether defendants exercised sufficient diligence in opposing the judgment as confirmed and whether a prima facie defense was presented in defendants’ motion to vacate. For the reasons given below, we affirm.

On March 15,1977, defendants executed a promissory note for $2,500 payable to plaintiff within 75 days thereafter and containing a provision for confession of judgment in the event of default. Added to the printed terms of the note is the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Des Plaines v. Scientific MacHinery Movers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Kuh v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Turner v. SmileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Deardorff v. Decatur & Macon County Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Brown v. Drovers National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API