Huelin v. State

The appellant was tried in the Criminal Court of Baltimore by the court, sitting without a jury, and was found guilty of robbery with a deadly weapon. He appeals from the conviction and asserts (a) that the evidence was insufficient and (b) that a comment by the trial judge in reviewing the evidence was “so erroneous as to constitute an error of law.”

The appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction is without merit. There was testimony to show that the victim had been robbed by a man wielding a tire iron and to identify the appellant as the assailant.…