Legal Opinion

Estate of D. E. Hamiel, Deceased, the Ohio National Bank of Columbus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1958No. 13211_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this case is whether income from a trust was taxable to the grantor.

The Tax Court found that the grantor was so taxable for the reasons that: (1) the income from the trust was, in reality, the income of the grantor, and taxable to him under Section 22(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 22(a), and (2) that the income of the trust, which was created to satisfy the grantor’s legal obligation of support and maintenance of his son, was taxable to him under Section 167 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 167.

Petitioner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  2. Hopkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Mairs v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buehner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Cecil R. Hopkins and Ruth O. Hopkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. Brooke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1969
  4. Morrill v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1964
  5. Hohenberg v. HohenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API