Legal Opinion

Cervantes Salazar v. Dretke

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided September 27, 2005No. 7:03-cv-00175PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RELIEF

BIERY, District Judge.

Petitioner Luis Cervantes Salazar filed this federal habeas corpus action pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 challenging his September, 1998, Bexar County capital murder conviction and sentence of death. For the reasons set forth below, petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief from this Court but is entitled to a Certificate of Appealability on a single claim.

I. Statement of the Case

A. The Offense and its Aftermath

There is no genuine dispute as to the operative facts of petitioner’s offense. During the…

2Cases cited165 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. DretkeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Bartee v. QuartermanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
  3. Mass v. QuartermanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Berkley v. QuartermanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
  5. Moore v. QuartermanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API