Legal Opinion

Ting v. AT&T

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 2003No. 02-15416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Darcy Ting, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Consumer Action, a non-profit membership organization, both as private attorneys general, brought suit against AT&T, alleging that AT&T’s Consumer Services Agreement (“CSA”) violates California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and that state’s Unfair Practices Act by barring customers from, among other things, pursuing claims against AT&T on a classwide basis. Finding the CSA unconscionable and in violation of California public policy, the district court1 issued a permanent injunction…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ting v. At&tCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API