Ting v. AT&T
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Darcy Ting, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Consumer Action, a non-profit membership organization, both as private attorneys general, brought suit against AT&T, alleging that AT&T’s Consumer Services Agreement (“CSA”) violates California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and that state’s Unfair Practices Act by barring customers from, among other things, pursuing claims against AT&T on a classwide basis. Finding the CSA unconscionable and in violation of California public policy, the district court1 issued a permanent injunction…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ting v. At&tCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007