Coffin v. Kelly
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
Were the inter vivos transfers accomplished by this decedent made by her in contemplation of death, i.e., as mere substitutes for testamentary dispositions, within the import and intendment of our statute? R.S. 54:34-1, c. In the present appeal, this is a factual question that involves the motive, intent and purpose of the transferor. Schweinler v. Martin,117 N.J. Eq. 67; 175 Atl. Rep. 71; affirmed, 13 N.J. Mis. R. 722;180 Atl. Rep. 774.
In general, a motive is a consideration which determines choice and becomes an incentive to undertake the accomplishment of some act. The inducement normally…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schweinler v. Thayer-MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1934
- Koch v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Central Hanover Bank Trust Co. v. MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- In Re HollanderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- In Re GemmellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Avery v. WalshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1946
- Johnson v. ZinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1947
- Montclair Trust Co. v. ZinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Schneider v. ZinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949