Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Viera

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the County Court of Sangamon County; the Hon. George W. Murray, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Puterbaugh

This is a suit in assumpsit by appellant against appellee and one W. G. Nelson, upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed by appellee to said Nelson for the sum of $150 and indorsed by the said Nelson. Appellee was duly served with summons returnable to the September term of court. On September 22, a default was entered against appellee for want of a plea, and at the same term, on December 24, 1902, judgment was entered against her for $157.50 and costs of suit. Daring the same term, on January 2, 1902, appellee, by her counsel, entered a viva voce motion to set aside said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hibbard v. MuellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Windett v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Culver v. BrinkerhoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Donaldson v. CopelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eager v. DerowitschWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sioux City Seed Co. v. MontgomeryWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cooper v. HandelsmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API