Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lonardo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1949No. 21660PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By McNAMEE, J:

Petitioners invoke these proceedings for the purpose of being admitted to reasonable bail. They are now confined to jail in default of bail fixed by the Municipal Court of Cleveland in the sum of $75,000.00 as to each petitioner. Each of the petitioners is charged with being a suspicious person in violation of the ordinances of the City of Cleveland. The maximum penalty for conviction upon this charge is a fine of $50.00 and imprisonment for thirty days.

The petitioners previously have been convicted of serious crimes on one or more occasions. The assistant Prosecutor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Fur Sammons v. SnowIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. LINDSEY, SHERIFF, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Garcia v. Wasylyshyn, Wd-07-041 (7-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Gallagher v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re PeriandriOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Lazzerini v. MaierOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API