Bonesteel v. Flack
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL by the plaintiffs from a judgment of nonsuit, ordered at the circuit. The material facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Bockes, J.
The plaintiffs claimed to recover the value of a quantity of liquors seized and sold by the defendant Glynn on execution, in favor of the defendant Flack, against one William Hubbard. Ho question is made in regard to the judgment or execution, nor is it pretended that the defendants were not jointly liable in the action if the liquors belonged to the plaintiffs. It was insisted on the trial, on the part of the defendants, that the proof showed the title to the property to be in Hubbard, the judgment debtor. The judge, on considering the whole case, nonsuited the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herring v. . HoppockNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Coon v. . KnapNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Filkins v. . WhylandNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Ludden v. HazenNew York Supreme Court · 1860
- Egleston v. KnickerbackerNew York Supreme Court · 1849
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re GarcewichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
- Lewis v. McCabeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Coe v. . ToughNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- S. Hirsch & Co. v. SteeleUtah Supreme Court · 1894
- Cook v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.