Legal Opinion

Garvis v. Scholten

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 25, 1992No. 91-1148PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

In the course of a child abuse investigation, the defendants disclosed medical information about the plaintiffs to the Iowa department of human services. The plaintiffs sued to recover damages because of this disclosure. The defendants moved for summary judgment, claiming immunity pursuant to Iowa Code section 232.73 (1987). This section affords immunity from liability to any person who in good faith aids and assists in the investigation of a child abuse report.

The district court believed the standard for good faith under section 232.73 is subjective rather than objective as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hofco, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Maples v. SiddiquiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Jackson v. State Bank of WapelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shannon and Danny NELSON, Individually, and on Behalf of E.N. F/K/A E.N., a Minor, Appellees, v. Lynn M. LINDAMAN, Lynn M. Lindaman, M.D., P.L.C. D/B/A Lindaman Orthopaedic, and Mercy Medical Center—Des Moines, AppellantsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Teachout v. Forest City Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. City of Riverdale, Iowa v. Allen Diercks, Marie Randol, and Tammie PictonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Rite Aid Corp. v. HagleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. J.E.B. v. DanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API