Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Hoffman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The possession by the payee of a promissory note in the condition in which it was originally delivered and free from any evidence therein of cancellation, carries with it presumptions in favor of the payee as owner. As a matter of evidence it constitutes a prima facie case’ that the note is unpaid.

Appellant concedes the correctness of the foregoing rule. She does, however, seek to overcome the effect of that prima facie case by allegations that in April, 1944, “for good, valuable, and sufficient considerations, the said Johanna L. Pennifill [deceased], while the owner of the promissory note .…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roebke v. AndrewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Knox v. RoehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hartzog's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Academy of Music Co. v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kidder v. KidderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pryor v. BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Pryor v. BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API