Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Kempf
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 29, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, S.
This is a proceeding by Charles W. Kempf to compel the payment of a legacy. Payment is resisted for the alleged reason that the conditions attached to its payment have not been complied with.
The third paragraph of the will of the above-named testator reads as follows; “ I give, devise and bequeath unto my beloved grandchildren, Mary R. Kempf and Charles W. Kempf, the children of my beloved son, Charles S. Kempf, now deceased, the sum of five thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars each to be paid to them when they arrive at 21 years of age respectively, but this legacy is made upon the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bryant v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hogan v. . CurtinNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ArrowsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Bryant v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Drace v. KlinedinstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steinbacher v. LessNew York Supreme Court · 1938