Legal Opinion

In re Fergurson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 18, 1998No. 98-B-2591PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

J1PER CURIAM. *

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from fifteen counts of formal charges instituted by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, David Fer-gurson, Sr., an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana. The charges allege violations of Rules 1.3 (lack of due diligence), 1.4(a) (failure to keep client reasonably informed), 1.4(b) (failure to comply with reasonable requests for information), 1.5(a) (charging an unreasonable and unearned fee), 1.5(f)(3) (failure to render periodic accounting), 1.15(a)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. La. State Bar Ass'n v. HinrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. In re FergursonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re LetellierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  2. In re HilburnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. In re FergursonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API