Legal Opinion

Foster Glassell Corporation v. Ackel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1936No. 5197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks judgment herein for the alleged balance on an open account in the amount of $896.61.

The case was before us on a previous occasion, and it will, therefore, be necessary to briefly review its history and mention the pertinent proceedings that have taken place.

After the filing of suit, defendant tendered an exception in which he pleaded, among other things, that the petition was vague and indefinite for the reason that the account sued on was not itemized.

The trial court sustained the plea of vagueness, and, according to its corrected minutes of June 27, 1934,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murff v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Flake v. FlakeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Hudson v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Foster & Glassell Co. v. AckelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pearce v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Morris v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Swimmer v. RappeletLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API