Legal Opinion
Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. Matarazzo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 22, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant to dismiss this action on the ground of forum non conveniens.
The defendant herein had originally moved this court to dismiss the complaint and to vacate the service 'of summons and complaint, on the ground that the defendant was not “doing business” within this district, so as to subject it to the jurisdiction of this court, and that service on the Brazil Export Corporation was not valid service on defendant.
The District Court granted this motion. However, on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the judgment of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Latimer v. S/A Industrias Reunidas F. MatarazzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- The Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D. C. v. Heinrich Bauer VerlagCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Irmgard M. Prack v. Sherman WeissingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Nestor Yerostathis, AKA Nestor Gerostathis v. A. Luisi, Ltd., and Shipping Developments Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.