Legal Opinion

B. & P., INC. v. Norment

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 1967No. 5-4090PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

This appeal is prosecuted from a summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellee, Letha Ann Norment, because of appellant B. & P. Inc.’s failure to respond to certain requests for admissions in the manner required by Ark.' Stat. Ann. § 28-358 (Eepl. 1962).

The litigation was initiated by a foreclosure petition upon a mortgage. Attached to the complaint was the note, executed in Forrest City, Arkansas; the mortgage to Bevis Shell Homes, Inc., showing a Tennessee acknowledgment; and the assignment to appellant B. & P., Inc.

After answer, appellee filed on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Hemphill v. OrloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Furst & Thomas v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Young v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Kingrey v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Surety Corporation v. Inland Properties, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968
  2. Stocker v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Gatlin Ex Rel. Gatlin v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Arkansas County v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Barnett Restaurant Supply, Inc. v. VanceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API