Legal Opinion

State v. Rackoff

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 2003No. A03A2455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

The State Court of Gwinnett County granted Stewart Daniel Rackoff’s motion to suppress the results of an Intoxilyzer 5000 breath alcohol test in this prosecution for driving under the influence. The trial court granted the motion because the Intoxilyzer machine was taken out of service five days after the breath test and the State presented no evidence that it had been successfully used “after the test performed on the defendant.” Pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (4), the State appeals from the trial court’s order. Because the trial court erred in granting the motion, we reverse.

O…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CauseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Knapp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Gidey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rackoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Braswell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Brown v. QBE Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API