City of Dallas v. Massingill
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentMcCRAW, Justice
I write the opinion for the majority of this Court predicated upon the assigned errors presented. I am of the opinion, however, that the trial court’s judgment is only interlocutory and that any appeal therefrom is premature.
The questioned judgment, after stating numerous fact findings, recites:
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Plaintiffs, Robert Massingill and Ray Reed, and the members of the above-described Class, recover of and from the City of Dallas, Defendant, the sums of money owed each member of the Class, all as prescribed herein, with interest thereon at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Hinde v. HindeTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Hargrove v. Insurance Investment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Baker v. HansenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Jones v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.