Brodrick Copygraph Co. v. Mayhew
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On demurrer to bill and motion to dissolve preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
SEAMAN, District Judge.
The bill is founded on letters patent No. 584,787, issued to Lowe and Cortelyou, June 22, 1897, owned by the complainants, under which they manufacture a machine known as the “Rotary Neostyle.” These machines are sold with the restriction that they are “licensed to be used only with stencil paper and ink (both of which are patented) made by the Neostyle Company,” and the defendant is charged as a contributory infringer, with making a “Rotary Neostyle Ink” specially designed for use with such machines, and sold to the purchasers thus licensed, to be so used in derogation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- Cortelyou v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cortelyou v. Charles E. Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Standard BreweryU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1909
- Mayhew v. Broderick Copygraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905