Legal Opinion

State v. . Edmonds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaleeb, J.

As to the motion for a nonsuit, the refusal of which is the basis of exceptions Nos. 1 and 4: ¥e must construe the evidence most favorably to the State, in passing upon such a motion, is the invariable rule of the law. Lynch v. Dewey, 175 N. C., 152. It is obvious from the above short recapitulation of the evidence that the defendant was the only person who had any motive for setting fire to this store and the goods. It also appears that he had an opportunity to set fire to them, when he returned to the store alone. It is obvious, also, from the use of kerosene oil, that the goods were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Lynch v. Dewey Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durham v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. . ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API