Legal Opinion

Sheehy v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1928No. [No. 34, April Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The purpose of this injunction suit is to> prevent the defendant from maintaining a blind, from which to shoot water fowl, at a point in Todd’s Bay, in Dorchester County, alleged to be in unlawful proximity to the water area within which the plaintiff claims priority of such gunning privileges by virtue of certain statutory provisions and of his interests as a riparian owner. The appeal is from a decree refusing the proposed injunction and dismissing the bill of complaint.

Chapter 568 of the Acts of 1927 provides, in part, as follows :

“All owners of riparian rights, their lessees or licensees…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hodson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Attorney General v. Anne Arundel County School Bus Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Tolman Laundry, Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Wampler v. LecompteSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API