Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Mlinarich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1985No. 473Published

1Dissent

SPAETH, President Judge,

dissenting:

A majority of the court today holds that the term “forcible compulsion” contained in the Crimes Code definitions of rape and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 3121, 3123, means “physical compulsion or violence.” Proceeding from the same legislative history that the majority has analyzed, I am led to quite a different conclusion: By the term “physical compulsion” the General Assembly meant “compulsion by physical, moral, or intellectual means or by the exigencies of the circumstances.” That we begin at the same point and end so far apart…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API