Legal Opinion

Claffey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1993No. A93A2251PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement in which she. reserved a right to appeal from the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, defendant Sandra Claffey pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine (Count 1) and possession of marijuana (Count 2). This appeal followed. Held:

In her sole enumeration of error, defendant asserts the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence that was seized pursuant to a search warrant. More specifically, defendant attacks the search warrant, asserting it was issued without probable cause because it was based on the tip of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. State v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hooten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Baez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Cotton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Cotton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Hooten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API