Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baxter v. City of Superior

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeitz, J.

In their brief plaintiff’s counsel say:

“We attempted to frame the complaint so that an action at law of the character formerly known as quo warranto is combined with an action for equitable relief, our idea being that if there is a legal remedy it must be that formerly known as quo warranto, and if there is no legal remedy then a court *362of equity has jurisdiction to inquire into the validity of these proceedings and give such relief as may be proper in the premises.”

At the outset it should be noted that, generally speaking, “Elections belong to the political branch of the government and are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ward v. SweeneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Lochschmidt v. RaislerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Duesing v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Burke v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Town of Burke v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API