Legal Opinion
Ballenger v. Applied Digital Solutions, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 31, 2002No. Civ.A.01-390 GMSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SLEET, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs, John G. Ballenger et al., (“The Compee plaintiffs”) were stockholders in the Compee Corporation. The Com-pec plaintiffs sold their shares to Applied Digital Solutions, Inc., (“ADSX”). The transaction required that the Compee plaintiffs be given unregistered ADSX shares in exchange for their Compee shares. ADSX promised to use its “best efforts” to register the stock as soon as possible. ADSX did not register the stock in a timely fashion, allegedly causing the plaintiffs to lose money as a result. The parties also agreed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- P. Stolz Family Partnership L.P. v. DaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- In Re Electronic Data Systems Corp. "ERISA" LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2004
- Vieth v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Ridge v. CampbellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Swope v. Central York School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.