Legal Opinion
Calabro v. Hescheles
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 17, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendant Peter R. Auster appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated October 15, 2004, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The requisite elements of proof in a medical or dental malpractice action are a deviation or departure from accepted practice and evidence that such departure was a proximate cause of injury or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Holbrook v. United Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bloom v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Terranova v. FinkleaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Loaiza v. LamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cohen v. KalmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Posokhov v. OselkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bennett v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.