Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Kepa Homes Corp.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 15, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.
This is an action by the buyer-homeowners to recover for the defendant’s alleged breach of contract, breach of warranty and G.L.c. 93A violations in the construction of their new house. After a jury trial, judgment was entered for the plaintiffs on their contract claim. The defendant has appealed pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A D. A., Rule 8C, on a charge of error in the trial judge’s denial of its motions in limine and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
In 1992, the plaintiffs entered into discussions with one Jose Martins (“Martins”), president of Kepa Homes Corp. (“Kepa”), about the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glenn v. AikenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Deerskin Trading Post, Inc. v. Spencer Press, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Gallant v. WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Minaya v. Massachusetts Credit Union Share Ins. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Donnelly v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Advanced Spine Centers, Inc. v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Holyoke Medical Center, Inc. v. GeorgeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Optimum Care Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation, Inc. v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014