Legal Opinion

Knapp v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*598OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Harris, J.

In Gleason v Holman Contract Warehousing (170 Misc 2d 668), this court, applying the rules set forth in McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, chapter 5 (§§ 51-61) for determining the retroactive or prospective-only operation of newly enacted statutes, and traversing the history and development of contribution and indemnification in the common law, culminating in Dole v Dow Chem. Co. (30 NY2d 143 [1972]), codified in the 1974 amendments to CPLR 1401, and otherwise perusing and examining the fact, intent and purpose of the "Omnibus Workers’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gleason v. Holman Contract Warehousing, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morales v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Seymour v. Victor Balata Belting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lagano v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API