Legal Opinion
Gropper v. STO CORP.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 8, 2005No. A05A1012PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
This appeal arises out of the trial court’s order striking and dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint for wilful failure to respond to discovery. Because the record supports the sanction, we find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion. We therefore affirm.
This is the second appearance of this case here. As more fully set out in Gropper v. STO Corp., 250 Ga. App. 820 (552 SE2d 118) (2001), plaintiffs Gary and Vicki Gropper, on behalf of themselves and their children, sought redress against three defendants for property damage and personal injuries allegedly arising out…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schrembs v. Atlanta Classic Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Louisiana Forum Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Deep South Construction, Inc. v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Loftin v. Gulf Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Motani v. Wallace Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Whitley v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Collins v. DickmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- KOHLER Et Al. v. VAN PETEGHEM Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- North Druid Development, LLC v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Carrier Corp. v. Rollins, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.