Legal Opinion

State v. Surety Corp. of America

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 25, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

Claim of State of Delaware.

The order appointing the receiver conferred no power on him to operate the business. The Insurance Commissioner, prior to the filing of the bill, had refused to renew the defendant’s certificate of authority to do business. The court is authorized by Section 573 of the Code “in a proper case made * * * to appoint a receiver to take charge of, settle and close up the affairs of said Company under the direction of the said Court, to enjoin it from doing business, and to make such order and decree as may be necessary or proper.”

It is not contended that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. New York v. JersawitSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Jones v. Maxwell Motor Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wax v. Riverview Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1942
  2. In Re the Liquidation of Integrity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Commissioner of Insurance v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. In Re International Match CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. In re the Receivership of International Re-Insurance Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API