Legal Opinion

Nieto-Espinoza v. Lowder Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 2013No. COA12-1316Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the Commission properly concluded plaintiffs failure to timely re-file his claim was not due to excusable neglect, and where we find no abuse of discretion in the Commission’s decision to decline to waive the Rule 613 deadline to allow plaintiff to re-file his claim, we affirm the order of the Commission.

On 1 August 2007, Adan Nieto-Espinoza (“plaintiff’) filed a Form 18 Notice of Accident to Employer, alleging that on 24 May 2007, during the course of his employment, a nail gun discharged into his knee. Overthecourseofthenextyear,anumberofpartieswereaddedorremoved from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Ramsey v. Southern Industrial Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Lee v. RosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API