Roma v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of manslaughter, and his punishment assessed at four years confinement in the penitentiary. Appellant filed a motion for continuance for want of the testimony of Frank Brothers, but the application for said witness does not show whether the same is the first or second application. Other witnesses swore in substance, to the same facts that appellant set up in his application that he expected to prove by said witness. This being true, we will treat the matter, in the absence of a statement to the contrary, as a second application. In the light of the last…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Serrato v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Fulton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Beauchamp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Hollingsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.