McCormick v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Bates, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
At the November, 1893, term of the district court for York county an information was filed by the county attorney in which the plaintiff in error was, in two counts, charged with larceny and the knowingly receiving of stolen property. At the February, 1894, term a trial was had, resulting in the following verdict:
“The State of Nebraska! , , , I February term, 1894, to-James McCormick. j wit’ Feb™ary 20, 1894.
“We, the jury in the above entitled cause, duly impaneled and sworn, do find the defendant James McCormick guilty as he stands charged in the first count of the infor*867mation and not guilty…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Fort Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- City of Fort Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- State v. ChambersWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
- Hogoboom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.