Legal Opinion

Morris v. Knight

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1820PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of debt for rent by the plaintiff below against Bethuel F. Morris and Daniel Hankins, founded on a joint contract made by the defendants. The plaintiff suggested on the record the sheriff’s return, that Hankinswas not found in his county.. Morris appeared and filed a general demurrer to the declaration, and the plain tiff joined in demurrer. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff against Morris alone.

The principal error assigned in this cause is, that the action is founded on a joint demand, and the judgment is against one of the defendants only. In this case the contract…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barton v. Petit and BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Lockart v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erwin v. ScottenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Gibbons v. SurberIndiana Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Burton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
  4. Thompson v. GovernorIndiana Supreme Court · 1828

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API