Legal Opinion
In Re the Suspension or Revocation of the License of DeMarco
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 2, 1980PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*27The opinion of the Court was delivered by
WILENTZ, C. J.
The sole issue before us is whether a statute which penalizes offenses by physicians was intended to result in a penalty totaling $200 for all offenses, no matter how many or how different, before a first conviction is obtained, or $200 for each such offense. Put differently, the sole issue is whether N.J.S.A. 45:9-22 authorizes the State Board of Medical Examiners (the Board) to impose multiple penalties upon an initial finding of multiple violations. We hold that it does.
The primary charge against respondent was that he caused 92 cases…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- State v. ProvenzanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- State v. ParmigianiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- State v. Gratale Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- State v. Angelo's Motor SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- In Re the Revocation of the License of PolkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. Churchdale Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- State v. ValentinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.