Legal Opinion

American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Coons

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1917No. 8160PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Pawnee County ; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by Arthur Coons against the American Bonding & Trust Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and dtefendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, O.

In the petition here it is alleged: That Robert Ohasteen on the 15th day of May, 1902, did execute a bond as the guardian of Arthur Coons with the plaintiff in error as his surety, which bond was duly approved by the judge of the probate court of Pawnee county on the 22d day of May, 1902. That from said date until June I, 1906, the said Robert Ohasteen continued' to act as said guardian by virtue of the bond aforesaid, when he executed another bond with the Columbia Bank & Trust Company in the su(m of $2,000, which bond was duly approved on the 26th day of June, 1906, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farrar and Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Freeman v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Spencer v. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Boyd v. WithersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. McCauley v. American Surety Co. of N.Y.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HembreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Knox v. CruelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API