Montague v. Hood
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before PuRDY, J., Berkeley, Action by R. L- Montague and R. P. Tucker against James R. Hood. This Circuit decree is: “This suit was instituted for the purpose of obtaining a permanent injunction against the defendant to prevent alleged repeated trespasses by him upon the premises referred to in the complaint.
Read the full summary
Before PuRDY, J., Berkeley, Action by R. L- Montague and R. P. Tucker against James R. Hood. This Circuit decree is: “This suit was instituted for the purpose of obtaining a permanent injunction against the defendant to prevent alleged repeated trespasses by him upon the premises referred to in the complaint. “The defendant lived about three miles from the premises, but had been renting the places for several years, — sub-letting portions of the premises to parties in actual occupancy. “While this state of things existed, the premises were optioned to the plaintiffs, and the options were…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Pope.
After a careful consideration of the testimony set forth in the record in this case, this Court is satisfied that the decree of the Circuit Judge is correct, and, therefore, adopts it as the opinion of this Court.
It is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hood v. EdensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919