Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher James

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2016No. 13-10543PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Federal law lacks a generic statute addressing nonconsensual rape, as every state has. Instead, 18 U.S.C. § 2241 prohibits aggravated forcible sexual assault. 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2) covers the less frequent scenario where an assailant sexually assaults a victim who is (A) mentally incapable of understanding what is happening, or (B) physically incapable of resisting the assault. Under § 2242(2)(A), sexually assaulting a person whose mental capacity is such that one cannot form the necessary consent in many ways…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. United States v. David WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. David NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
  4. Ellis v. Whitewater Auto IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  5. United States v. Anthony De La TorrienteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API