United States v. Christopher James
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Federal law lacks a generic statute addressing nonconsensual rape, as every state has. Instead, 18 U.S.C. § 2241 prohibits aggravated forcible sexual assault. 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2) covers the less frequent scenario where an assailant sexually assaults a victim who is (A) mentally incapable of understanding what is happening, or (B) physically incapable of resisting the assault. Under § 2242(2)(A), sexually assaulting a person whose mental capacity is such that one cannot form the necessary consent in many ways…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- United States v. David WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. David NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
- Ellis v. Whitewater Auto IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
- United States v. Anthony De La TorrienteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.