Legal Opinion
Baltimore Steel Erectors, LLC v. The Hanover Insurance Company
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 23, 2019No. 1:18-cv-02560Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for : the use and benefit of BALTIMORE STEEL ERECTORS, LLC : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 18-2560 : THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently pending and ready for resolution is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and stay action. (ECF No. 7). The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion will be denied. I. Background The following facts are undisputed except where otherwise…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States of America, for the Use of R. F. Hudson v. Peerless Insurance Company, United States of America, for the Use of R. M. Bartenstein, John H. Bartenstein, and Michael H. Kelly, T/a R. M. Bartenstein & Associates v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- United States of America, for and on Behalf of Portland Construction Company v. Weiss Pollution Control CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States ex rel. Tusco, Inc. v. Clark Construction Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. N.U., Inc. v. Gulf InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986