Expro Americas, LLC v. Walters
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKing, Justice
¶ 39. The majority finds that the chancery court’s decision to dismiss H & H with prejudice was errbr. Because I find no error in the • chancellor’s decision, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority.8
¶ 40. “A dismissal with prejudice indicates a dismissal on the merits.” Jackson v. Bell, 123 So.3d 436, 439 (Miss.2013). A Rule 41(b) dismissal “operates as an adjudication upon the merits.” Miss. R. Civ. P. 41(b). It is appropriate for failure to prosecute or to comply with the rules of civil procedure or any order of court, or after the plaintiff has completed the presentation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Land & Resources Co., Inc. v. DobbsMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- BUSH, ET UX. v. City of LaurelMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
- Jackson v. BellMississippi Supreme Court · 2013