Stolar v. Turner

(dissenting) — Less than a year ago we deliberately filed an otherwise unnecessary written opinion solely in order to state our owm interpretation of Rules 340 and 342 of our Rules of Civil Procedure. Schroder v. Claypool, 235 Iowa 135, 136, 16 N. W. 2d 1. We were then, as now, passing on a motion of appellee to affirm the decision of the trial court for appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 342. Although written opinions in such matters are not ordinarily resorted to, we thought “the questions of sufficient importance and interest to the profession to warrant a published opinion.” All…