Legal Opinion

Provo City Corp. v. Willden

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1989No. 20983Published

1Opinion of the Court

768 P.2d 455 (1989)

PROVO CITY CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Rulon Duane WILLDEN, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20983.

Supreme Court of Utah.

January 23, 1989.

W. Andrew McCullough, Orem, for defendant and appellant.

James Brady, Vernon F. (Rick) Romney, Provo, for plaintiff and appellee.

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Rulon Duane Willden appeals his conviction of soliciting sexual conduct in violation of section 12.45.010 of the Provo City ordinances. He claims that section 12.45.010 is unconstitutionally overbroad. We agree that the ordinance violates the free speech clause of the first…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API