Lee v. Lee
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. A party seeking specific performance of a contract must show substantial compliance with his part of the agreement; otherwise he is not entitled to a decree. In this case the plaintiffs alleged that they were ready, willing, and able to comply with their obligations under the contract; and the evidence having shown a breach of a material condition thereof, the plaintiffs did not prove their case as laid, and a nonsuit was properly awarded.
2. Where in such case the main defendant filed a cross-action seeking recovery against two of the plaintiffs on a promissory note, the parties thus sued…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldberg v. Provident Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Finlay v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Robinson v. VickersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Ledbetter v. GoodroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Geer v. GrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- A. E. Speer Incorporated v. McCorveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Kirk v. First Georgia Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Matthews v. BlanosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Saine v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.