Legal Opinion

Lee v. Lee

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1941No. 13550, 13551PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. A party seeking specific performance of a contract must show substantial compliance with his part of the agreement; otherwise he is not entitled to a decree. In this case the plaintiffs alleged that they were ready, willing, and able to comply with their obligations under the contract; and the evidence having shown a breach of a material condition thereof, the plaintiffs did not prove their case as laid, and a nonsuit was properly awarded.

2. Where in such case the main defendant filed a cross-action seeking recovery against two of the plaintiffs on a promissory note, the parties thus sued…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Provident Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Finlay v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Robinson v. VickersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Ledbetter v. GoodroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Geer v. GrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. A. E. Speer Incorporated v. McCorveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Kirk v. First Georgia Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Matthews v. BlanosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Saine v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API