Legal Opinion

Balsbaugh v. Zeck

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1985No. Appeal, No. 3210 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Patrick J. Dostick, Jr. has appealed an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County dismissing his suit in mandamus against the Supervisors of Heidelberg Township (township).

The issue is that of whether the court of common pleas erred by rejecting Dostick’s plea that the township was collaterally estopped from defending against *629his action for reinstatement as a patrolman on the police force on the ground that his dismissal from the force was for reasons of economy, by reason of a prior unappealed adjudication by the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board holding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Power Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Stewart v. Tomis Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Zeck v. BalsbaughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. City of Harrisburg v. LaukemannCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Commonwealth, Board of PropertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Stokes v. Board of Trustees of Temple UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Adelphia Gateway, LLC v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Brandywine Village Associates, LP v. East Brandywine TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Kovalenko v. Call-Chronicle Newspapers Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API