Legal Opinion

Stroman v. South Carolina Power Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1933No. 13580PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeEr.

This is an action for damages arising out of an alleged breach of contract. It appears that on June 21, 1926, the Springfield Tight & Power Company conveyed to one W. D. Black certain described real estate, including a mill pond, buildings, and machinery. The deed, inter alia, contained the following, which preceded the habendum clause: “The grantee agrees to sell the said mill pond and adjacent real estate, herein and hereby conveyed, including buildings thereon and machinery contained in said building to C. B. and G. E- Stroman,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Easterly v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Welch v. Edisto Realty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API