Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943No. Docket No. 72, Calendar No. 42,422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on directed jury verdict for defendants.

In October, 1940, upon entering the employ of defendant Chrysler Corporation, plaintiff’s son, Charles LaForest, signed the following application for insurance

“I hereby apply for life insurance in the amount of $2,000, and sickness and accident insurance in the amount of $10, weekly benefit, in accordance with the terms of the group policies issued to my employer ; and in consideration of the issuance of this insurance to me I authorize the deduction of $.39 per day from my wages, and I authorize the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Szymanski v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Klat v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. England v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Klym v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Aetna Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Lineberger v. Security Life & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Tsang v. KanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API