Legal Opinion · Dissent

Briggs v. Goodwin

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 21, 1977No. 75-1642Published

1DissentWilkey, Circuit Judge

We are confronted at the outset by the inescapable facts that defendant Goodwin is a prosecutor and that the indictment made the subject of this civil suit for damages occurred in the courtroom, the native habitat of judges, jurors, prosecutors and witnesses —all of whom having, and from time immemorial having had, absolute immunity from civil suit as essential participants in the judicial process. The normal role of the Prosecutor in the courtroom is as Advocate; his actions are those of a spokesman advocating the cause of his client, the government, state or federal. In this particular case…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API