Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Nucor Corporation v. Nebraska Public Power District

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1990No. 87-1963, 87-2046Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHeaney, Senior Circuit Judge

I concur in Parts I, III and IV of the majority opinion as far as it is necessary to reach those issues. I dissent from Part II.

While I accept that the Power District may have breached its duty to charge fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory rates, I believe that it was error for the district court to submit the question of damages to the jury. Damages are too speculative.

This Court lacks both the wherewithal and the legislative authority to determine damages in this instance because more than one fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory rate schedule may exist. Courts do not have the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Metropolitan Utilities District v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Nebraska Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. YeiserNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. York County Rural Public Power District v. O'CONNORNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. McGinley v. Wheat Belt Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API